I think the big issue to challenge is the wearing of masks. All the evidence says they are useless and can be dangerous. The simple fact is that the viral particles are too small to be contained by any fabric, whether you're breathing them in or out. There is no way around this for the lockdown zealots. As there is no benefit but there are risks, this should be something we should be challenging. I would argue it is also degrading treatment under article 3 of the Human Rights Act. We need someone to legally challenge this specific item. Does any one know a solicitor that could help with this? The other thing would be to crowdfund to put an advert in a few of the main newspapers quoting facts like the evidence against masks, the actual IFR, the fact that Sweden that didn't lockdown fared better than us, the percentage of people who are already thought to be immune, and therefore the low figure needed for herd immunity. The percentage of people who are under 70 without co-morbidities that have died due to the virus. It would also be good to add a few quotes from proper epidemiologits and virologists instead of computer modellers. If the public are only watching BBC and reading the mainstream press, they will never get this information.